While a fleet wide program, FRAM was a focus on Destroyers and
with a multitude of classes of Destroyers, Destroyer Escorts and other ships
that received the Navy's Fleet Rehabilitation and Modernization (FRAM)
reconstruction program, the Gyrodyne Helicopter Historical
Foundation set upon the task to research the history of this program as
it applied to the installation of Gyrodyne's QH-50 Drone Anti-Submarine
Helicopter (DASH) on those FRAM MK I and II Ships.
This listing also includes some ships that might not have
received FRAM but did receive the DASH weapon system that was an integral part
to the FRAM program.
Please keep in mind that FRAM was a confusing program in
that the installation was not only different per class of ships, but that
installation (FRAM MK I) or modernization (FRAM MK II) could be different within a
specific class as well. Further, while many
ships received FRAM, not all received DASH while others received DASH and ASROC.
We
will try and explain these confusions, by class of ship.
There were three main destroyer types that received the
Navy's Fleet Rehabilitation and Modernization (FRAM) reconstruction: FLETCHER,
SUMNER and the GEARING class series of destroyers. OF the GEARING series, there were variants of that class that
had been earlier modified for specific missions (i.e. Anti-Submarine Warfare,
Hunter-Killer Destroyers and Radar Picket). FRAM was different for
all versions. Click on either the ship or link below and explore the history of
FRAM:
|
With only 3 of the 175
Fletcher class Destroyers receiving a FRAM II Modernization at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard in 1960 and yet
another which operated DASH which had over 1000 landings by 1960, yet did
not get FRAM, One has to wonder how that worked. It is explained here on our
FLETCHER CLASS FRAM page.
|
|
|
When the Navy sought to improve upon the
FLETCHER class destroyer, they did so by building upon the existing
hull and machinery of the FLETCHER but added more firepower and capabilities.
What emerged in May 1942 was the ALLEN M. SUMNER
class of destroyer which weighed over 150 tons heavier and was
3 knots slower than the FLETCHER, yet was so versatile due to its size,
the NAVY decided 33 of the remaining 53 SUMNERS needed to receive a FRAM
"modernization" That history is here.
|
|
|
With the added 150 tons, the SUMNER
class was not only 3 knots slower than the FLETCHER class they were
suppose to improve upon, the SUMNER also did not have the required range
the Navy sought. To fix this major problem, the Naval design board
proposed to lengthen future SUMNERs by an additional 14 feet for
additional oil storage. This resulted in the creation of the GEARING
Class destroyer and the NAVY sought the FRAM program for all 45
remaining destroyers, except 1. That history is here.
|
|
|
Between 1949-53 a special program saw
the conversion of 36 GEARING class destroyers into long range-warning picket vessels.
When these ships received their early warning radar systems, they became
the FRANK KNOX class of DDRs.
In 1960 when FRAM selection was occurring, the Navy decided to provide
FRAM to all KNOX class DDRs yet not all became DDs in the process. Their
reasons why is listed here.
|
|
|
When the Navy took eight GEARING class destroyers and outfitted
them in December 1949 to become Hunter-Killer Destroyers, they created the Carpenter Class
of DDKs. These ships were to form groups for the purpose of long and
short-range interception of submarines before they could attack convoys. All
these ships received FRAM- albeit it was not the same for all eight! Their
history is here.
|
|
|
Although originally designed as GEARING class
destroyers (DD), the Navy completed two as anti-submarine warfare (ASW) destroyer escorts
(DDE) and then modified 5 other "4-gun Gearings" for the same
mission. These ships became the BASILONE
class DDE and by the time they all received their FRAM I
reconstruction in July 1962, they all had been reclassified as DD. Their
history is here.
|
|
|
Originally conceived as an upgraded variant of the coastal escort,
these DEALEY class destroyer
escorts were fitted with the modern SQS-4 sonar and fire power
of a FRAM II destroyer which gave them the capability to counter the fast
Soviet Submarine threat. Of the 13 vessels, all but 3 received DASH as
part of their FRAM modernization. Their history is here.
|
|
|
Built from the Keel-up with all the FRAM improvements destroyers were
receiving in 1960, the
BRONSTEIN class of Destroyer Escorts were new construction but
were part of the FRAM program to evaluate the feasibility of building into
new vessels, the FRAM upgrades like the new weapon systems called ASROC
and DASH and also incorporating the updated SQS-26 AX(R) sonar system to
prosecute the targets these stand off weapon systems allowed for. While
only two ships were built, this experiment was a success as these ships
sail to this day! Their history is here.
|
|
|
Although originally built for fast Carrier defense,
the MITSCHER class of Destroyer Leaders
forged several new paths for the U.S. Navy including the introduction of
1200 psi Steam plants, various configurations of machinery as well as
sensors and weaponry that allowed for larger and faster destroyers to
screen and protect fast carrier task forces. While
only 4 ships were built, each was different to test specific variations of
systems yet each received FRAM and each had DASH. Their history is here.
|
|
|
The DASH Weapon system would never have been able to succeed, if it
were not for the Destroyer
Tenders that provided the heavy maintenance for the over 160
Fleet Destroyers that carried DASH. These floating workshops were massive:
While a GEARING destroyer would have a crew complement of slightly over
300, a typical tender had over 3000 crew to man a ship some 5 times the
size of a destroyer. We recognize these 17
ships here as DASH ships; for after their FRAM modernization,
some Tenders carried 8 DASH drones at a time as a reserve for the
destroyers they serviced.
|
|
|
With the U.S. Navy stretched thin in the far east during the 60's and
with the height of the cold war, it became clear that the Japanese Navy
needed to expand its then-role of a simple coastal patrol force to that of
being able to protect its own sea-lanes from Submarines. The U.S. Navy
provided four Qh-50C/D aircraft to get the
Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force (JMSDF) DASH program
started. Here is the story of the Seven vessels of the JMSDF that carried
DASH.
|
|
|
We are currently working on the
GARCIA class destroyer escorts to determine WHICH received FRAM.
Further, how to classify the BELKNAP (DLG-26) and the NEW JERSEY (BB-62) which
operated DASH but did not receive a complete DASH installation is a question.
|